Sdsu Class Schedule Fall 2022, Articles W

[1] IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronic . , . . Highlight important findings sufficiently? IEEE T. Consumer Electronics . So the typical time of getting back the first review is around 1-2 months, depending on the journal. If you are unsure it may be better to disclose these in the confidential comments section. Read this article till the end to get answers to all your questions. Sci-hub struck at the heart of the oligopoly of purely commercial publishers, which includes Elsevier and Wiley, who run scientific publishing like a fiefdom, charging exorbitant subscriptions or publishing fees, making exponential profits, and treating the intellectual output of scientists and institutions as if it was all their personal property. //-->Manuscripts - Focus on your content, not on formatting it. | Wiley In the submission cover letter, please provide details about other published or submitted papers having substantial overlap (including data sets) with the new CD . Depending on the conservation objective, de-extinction outcomes range from maintaining viable seed or embryos in the freezer, through regenerating a few individuals to keep in captivity, to establishing self-sustaining populations in the wild in large . I had a similar query, so I'm putting this in the thread. Please update if any progress ormore information regarding these journals. 1 Answer to this question Answer: Usually the status "Under review" indicates that the paper has cleared the admin check and it has been sent to the external peer reviewer or in-house section editor. In this case, you may wish to familiarize yourself with examples of other reviews done for the journal, which the editor should be able to provide or, as you gain experience, rely on your own evolving style. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. "When the comments seem really positive, but the recommendation is rejectionit puts the editor in a tough position of having to reject a paper when the comments make it sound like a great paper." One of my manuscripts is there for nearly 4 months. Scholarly interest in the experience of dehumanization, the perception that one is being dehumanized, has increased significantly in recent years, yet the construct lacks a validated measurement. Conflict of Interest. I'm As we know many journals are posting preprints (DOI) in advance before the peer-review process. What can reviewers do to help? wiley manuscript status under consideration. Yeah, we did over a week ago. //-->Disorder-tuned conductivity in amorphous monolayer carbon [CDATA[// >A Critical Comparison of Mildly Acidic versus Alkaline Zinc Batteries Most journals give reviewers the option to provide some confidential comments to editors. An estimated 6.5 million Americans 65 years of age or older are living with ADthe sixth leading . [CDATA[// > They have various applications, such as fuel transport, self-cleaning windows, anticorrosion protection, nontoxic coatings for medical devices, and optical instruments. For resubmitted manuscripts, peer reviewers who have previously reviewed a manuscript become essential in the peer review process-editors usually only request the same peer reviewers to provide feedback on resubmitted manuscripts. If you suspect plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, but cannot recall or locate exactly what is being plagiarized, notify the editor of your suspicion and ask for guidance.